Since the critical and commercial acclaim of her self-funded 2007 recording of Bach’s The Goldberg Variations
pianist Simone Dinnerstein
has become nothing less than a rock star of
Baroque and classical music. More importantly, she has made it her
mission to evangelize and popularize not only Bach, but classical music
in general, making it approachable and fun in a way that recalls the
efforts of such giants as André Previn. Having just released her latest
CD, which interprets Bach’s Inventions and Sinfonias, she took time out
to speak with us about the appeal of these supposedly entry-level
pieces, the importance of music education, and how open ears are every
bit as important as dexterous fingers.
What made you decide to record an album of Bach’s Inventions and Sinfonias?
Well, I have in mind a multi-year project where I’ll
record all of Bach’s keyboard works, so I thought it would be
interesting to start with my first introduction to Bach. And for most
pianists, the first Bach pieces that they ever played were the
Inventions. So, as a kind of beginning of my own narrative of this
journey, I start with the ones that he himself wrote as a guide to
I understand that the Inventions have a great deal of meaning for you personally.
Well, my earliest memories of Bach have to do with the
Inventions and my own experience of playing them and wanting to play
certain ones that were beyond my reach at that point. I remember being
nine or ten years old, and friends of mine were able to play the D
minor Invention, and it was too hard for me. I was really jealous! I
think I learned so much, not only about how to play Bach but how to play
any kind of music on the piano by studying the Inventions, because
you’re learning how to balance and manipulate two voices that are
equally important. A lot of piano music isn’t written that way. A lot of
it places much more emphasis on the right hand having melodic dominance
and the left hand being more of a harmonic support. Learning something
where it’s so clearly outlined that the two hands are equally important
carries over to how you see all music. You start to see music as
being made up of multiple lines and how to think about music as many
voices, as opposed to one thick texture. The Sinfonias were pieces that I
listened to a lot as a teenager. I was really obsessed with Glenn
Gould’s recording of them, and I remember listening to them a lot with
my husband (who at that time was my boyfriend), and I guess I have
romantic associations with those pieces because I listened to them a lot
when I first met him.
In your opinion, what is inventive about a Bach Invention?
Well, there are so many things that are inventive. I mean,
in his preface to the works, he wrote about how this was a guide to
keyboard players or, as he said—keyboard “lovers”—as to how to think
about two- or three-voice counterpoint, and how to play cantabile
in a “singing” way. The Inventions go through different keys so it’s
also exploring the color of each harmonic area. And Bach, being Bach,
wrote these stunning pieces of music as practical teaching exercises.
It’s almost like all of his musical output has been concentrated into
two or three voices. Each one is quite short but they have very
different characters from one to another. Sometimes you’ll have
something that’s almost a double aria from a cantata or you’ll have
something that sounds like a movement of a Brandenburg Concerto that has
a kind of orchestral sound. I think there was a tremendous amount of
imagination that went into writing these pieces.
Since Bach doesn’t specify tempo in the pieces, how did you decide on the proper tempo for each one?
I think tempo is one of the exciting challenges about
playing Bach because you can really go many different ways. Sometimes
you have a particular type of dance in mind that would give you a sense
of a tempo—a fast dance, a slow dance, a walking dance, that kind of
thing—that gives you an indication as to what would feel natural in
terms of playing. Also, I think his choice of the pulse of what
kind of notes he’s using—sixteenth-notes, eighth-notes, 6/8 time
signature, and so on—those kinds of decisions also can give you a clue.
That said, I do think you can make the Inventions work at
many different tempos, and that points out a really fun aspect of
learning Bach: you can make an argument for many different ways of
playing the same piece of music. Also, some of the decisions I made were
based on the context of a particular piece being in the context of all
of the Sinfonias and Inventions. I think if I just played one by itself
it might make sense to play it in a certain way, but I wanted to make
sure there was enough variety between them. Also, I was working with
quite a temperamental piano. It’s really one of my favorite pianos and
I’ve used it for many recordings, but it’s old. It’s a 1903 Steinway and
it seems to want to do things a certain way.
How does your interpretation of Bach differ from what Glenn Gould has done?
His recording of these pieces is actually one of my
favorites of all of his work, but to be honest, I stopped listening to
it once I started working on my own. I feel like the way he plays these
pieces is extremely personal. The piano that he used was really a bit of
a “honky-tonk” piano which had all of these problems, and that actually
made that recording very authentic. Most people learn these pieces on
their family’s instrument, which is usually not concert-grade. So
there’s something very homey about Gould’s recording, and I like the
fact that the piano has imperfections. I wouldn’t even want to compare
myself to him because he’s such a deity, but I don’t think I think about
the music in the same way when I’m playing it myself. I think about it
as being much more legato. When I’m playing, I’m thinking a lot about
breath and shape and contour. My articulation is just completely
different than the choices that Gould made.
How have the recordings of the Inventions changed over
time? How did you put your unique stamp on them in comparison to those
It might be better to talk about general trends in Bach
performance, not specific to the Inventions. Before Gould, there was a
much more romantic approach. If you listen to Edwin Fischer or Myra
Hess, when they played Bach on the piano, they were using all of the
piano’s abilities. In other words, they were using the pedal, they were
using a range of dynamics, and it was much more about seeing Bach
through the lens of their own period, pre-war and during the war, during
which people were really into individuality.
Then, Glenn Gould had a unique vision of the music that
was in sync with who he was. After him, I think there arose a
generation, even two generations, who thought he represented how Bach
should sound. But, of course, he wasn’t the norm. So, now I think
that playing Bach has become a little bit more uniform. People are much
more leery of using any pedal when they play, for example.
I just saw András Schiff perform the Goldberg Variations
when I was in Seattle, and he didn’t use any pedal at all. He is now not
using any pedal when he plays Bach. I think we’ve been very much
dominated by the movement of historically authentic performance and
thinking about how to make the piano sound like the harpsichord or the
clavichord, and that’s affected everything: tempo, articulation, tempo,
and dynamics. I guess I don’t really think of it that way when I’m
playing. I feel that I’m playing it on a piano and that I should
use the full range of the instrument because, to me, it only brings more
out of Bach’s music. It doesn’t take away from the music—it just shows
more layers of complexity.
What’s your favorite Invention and why?
At the least of my favorites is the Invention in B
flat major. There is such a beautiful feeling of openness and there’s
something about it that’s almost yielding. I think that about other
pieces he’s written in the key of B flat; there’s something about
that key that he just felt was open, warm, and almost like a hug. My
favorite Sinfonia is the one in E flat major, which is actually
very unusual. In all of the other Sinfonias the three voices are very
equal and they all trade off similar material, whereas in that one it’s
written differently, as the bass line is really like a continuo part. It’s basically a two-part Invention plus continuo, so it’s much more like a wind duet or a vocal duet. It’s so beautiful.
Which edition of the Bach Inventions do you think is best for the aspiring pianist to start playing?
The one that I use now is the Bärenreiter edition, which I
guess is one of the most recent and historically informed editions, and
it’s very nicely printed. But there is an edition for students that I
had used in the past that serves as a guide to ornamentation, and
provides other useful information. Now, when I’m learning a piece of
music, I don’t want to see all of that stuff. I want to be able to think
more freely about it myself, but when you’re a student, you really need
help in knowing how to look at a piece of music. You’re learning how to
be a detective.
What do you think is the most important thing that a pianist can learn by mastering these Inventions?
Well, the most obvious thing is that your left hand is
going to get an awful lot of attention. You’re learning how to play
complicated patterns and to play expressively with a left hand, and
that’s not usual. This is probably the first experience of having to do
that as a pianist. And the other thing you’re learning by doing this is
to multi-task your hearing so that you can hear two voices
simultaneously. That’s actually the hardest thing. What’s even harder
than playing them at the same time is being able to listen and
follow the two lines as they’re going along. We’re not used to that.
There’s really nothing in contemporary popular music that’s like this;
it’s all dominated by one voice.
I was thinking about the music that my son has been
listening to. He listens to hip-hop, and Jay-Z has done all of these
different collaborations with artists, so you’ll have something like
Jay-Z and Justin Timberlake, but they don’t ever sing at the same time.
If they do, one is very much subservient to the other, like a
call-and-response. Most pop music is like that, so we’re not used to
thinking that there could be two voices that are equally important and
that we actually have to pay attention to both at the same time. The
biggest thing any student will gain from studying Bach’s Inventions is
that it will guide them into that type of listening.
Given this “multitimbral” nature of Bach, what are some good practice techniques for mastering it?
I’ve noticed for many students that they should practice
hands separately. You need to know exactly what you’re doing with each
hand. I also think that with Bach, it can be really useful to sing one
of the voices while playing the other one. It’s hard to do and it might
not be practical in some of the Inventions that are hopping around, but
in some of the ones that are slower it could be possible. If one of my
students had a certain part where they had an imitation [i.e., a
repeating musical phrase] taking place at different times, I’d have them
play it as a unison just to hear and see that they’re doing the same
thing, just at different times. Obviously, the other thing is breaking
it down so you’re not taking on the whole piece all the time, but
instead practicing and mastering one section of it before you move on to
Continued on next page...
What is the difference for you between performing the music live and a studio recording?
I think they’re completely different experiences. I love
the process of recording because it’s very private and for me, it’s not
at all about playing to an audience. I’m just playing to an ideal that’s
in my head. My inner ear hears it and my outer ear tries to recreate
that, and in a recording session I can keep on working on it until it
comes out how I like it. My dad is an artist, and it’s much more like
what he does, where he’ll spend a whole morning working on an image of
an eye, shading it, and then he thinks he shaded it too much so he
erases some of it, and he takes a walk and comes back and looks at it
again with a fresh perspective. It’s a process.
A live concert is completely different because it’s
happening in real time and there’s an audience, which may or may not be
affecting how I feel. Also, you’re dealing with whatever piano is there
in the concert hall. In recording sessions, I have a piano technician
there for the entire time, so if there’s a trill that isn’t working
well, and I realize it’s because one of the hammers isn’t moving rapidly
enough, then I call him in and he fixes it. In a concert, there’s
nothing you can do—you just keep on going! Sometimes I’ve faced pianos
that have such stiff actions that there’s no way I can play at the tempo
I want to. It just won’t work on that instrument, so I have to alter
how I’m playing it to make it work. Or I’m playing in an acoustical
space that’s very wet or very dry, which changes how you play. So there
are a lot of external circumstances that interfere in a concert. But at
the same time, there’s something very special about it being live and
being in the moment. There’s really nothing else like it.
Why do you think Bach’s Inventions are still performed? What makes them live on?
In terms of them being played and studied, I think that
they’re almost like a type of gospel for keyboard players. They show us
how to play Bach, and they show us how to think about music in the way
that fairy tales or myths show us how to think about narrative. We all
grow up being told fairy tales, and those story lines tend to be
repeated in novels. We see parallels in in history and even in studying
great literature, we always go back to those folk tales. I think there’s
a quality in the Inventions that is almost like that, in that it’s
showing us the bones of telling a musical story. This is what
counterpoint is. Then we hear counterpoint in all other music afterwards
because we heard it in Bach first.
Keyboard covers a lot of synthesizer music and gear, so we have to ask: Was Wendy Carlos’ Switched on Bach ever an influence on you?
I wouldn’t call it an influence, though I did think it was pretty fantastic.
Have you ever used an electronic keyboard?
I’m just starting to explore digital keyboards. I’m not
exploring the different sounds or effects, but I’m actually planning a
project where I’m going to play the Inventions in public schools in New
York and DC, and Yamaha is lending me one of their digital keyboards so
that I can go from classroom to classroom with it. They’re much more
portable [than acoustic pianos]. I think that there have been so many
advances in technology and they’re really quite nice, actually. Yamaha
also makes the Disklavier piano in many different sizes. You could even
get a real concert grand that’s a Disklavier. It’s a regular piano; it’s
an acoustic instrument. But there’s this technology wherein it records
exactly how you play the keys and the pedals and it retains that
information. So you could have a performance that you gave repeated, and
you could see the keys moving, and they’ll move exactly how you moved
them. That’s already amazing enough, but if you link to another
Disklavier in the world, you could play in New York and the Disklavier
in Australia will play exactly as you’re playing. It’s pretty
incredible. It’s amazing. So I’m going to be doing some concerts and
master classes on the Disklavier that will then be “broadcast” all over
the country via these instruments.
How can classical musicians attract a larger audience these days?
I think that we have a serious problem in the United
States in that there’s definitely a waning of interest in classical
music. I think it’s quite tied to the fact that people are not studying
instruments. Part of what creates interest in music is actually playing
music! When kids do study music in public schools, they’re studying
band and they’re not playing classical—they’re playing contemporary
popular music. I find this challenge so overwhelming that I try to deal
with it by just thinking about where I live and how I can reach out to
I live in Park Slope in Brooklyn. My husband teaches at
our local public elementary school, which also happens to be the school
that I went to as a child, so I feel very connected to this community. I
think that schools are more natural gathering places for communities
than, say, religious institutions or community centers. A lot of things
happen in the schools; you go there to vote, so it’s a sort of hub. So, I
created a concert series at our local school called Neighborhood
Classics. What I do is I invite other musicians to give evening
recitals, donating any profits from ticket sales to the school and the
PTA. This series has become incredibly successful. Our neighborhood is
one where most of the parents are my age and mostly professionals, but
they wouldn’t normally go to a classical music concert. It’s noteworthy
that this is the demographic that used to go to classical music
concerts, but now they don’t, for many different reasons. They need to
pay for child care, there’s no time to go from Brooklyn to Manhattan,
and so on. But they can come to these concerts, and I’ve found that
they’re as much fun for the parents as they are for the kids.
I also organize concerts where musicians who would
normally play at night will come and do a presentation for the kids
during the day. And the children know me now; they know that my favorite
composer is Bach. This is all a very long-ended way of saying that I
wish this could happen all over the country because I think that if I
ever can do this—and I hope that I can—I’d like to start a nationwide
program where a musician would adopt a local series and create a
relationship with the community where the community then trusts that the
musicians that come to perform are going to be great because they know
that their resident musician is great. The goal is that kids get to know
the musician and start going to concerts in first grade, so that by the
time they’re in fifth grade they’ve gone to quite a lot of concerts and
have a feeling of identification with music and the people that play
it. I think that could be quite an interesting movement to start—kind of
What was it like to perform at the Maryland Correctional Institute for Women?
That was one of the most memorable concerts I’ve ever
given. It was extremely moving. I went in with a certain set of
expectations and it turned out it was quite different than I thought it
would be. I had performed in a men’s prison several years before, and
had kind of assumed that the men would be happy because, of course, some
young woman is coming in to play for them. But with the women, I was
worried that they would see me as being some kind of a threat or from a
different world. You know, I think “woman to woman” can sometimes be so
complicated, but they were so warm and welcoming. They were crying and
telling me stories about their families and about their children who
studied music. They also told me how they studied music, and I
told them about my son and my family. They really listened to the music,
and I could tell it really affected them. From that experience, I
learned not to pre-judge. It completely surprised me.
How did you market your crowd-funded Goldberg Variations CD so successfully, given such a tough market for classical music?
I think it was probably a combination of things. I think
part of it is the actual sound of the music. I was true to how I felt
the music to be and I think that people can hear that, so I think that
might have stood out a bit. But also for my first CD, The Goldberg Variations, there were two press pieces that were extremely helpful: a feature in the New York Times and a feature on Slate.com,
and they both came out the day the CD was released. I think they both
had an enormous effect. The other thing that I think has built my career
in the United States is radio. National Public Radio has been so good
to me. I’ve done many interviews with them, and I’ve had a lot of people
write me or come up to me after concerts telling me that they heard me
first on the radio. They’ll say that they either heard an interview, or
that the station played something from my CD and that’s how they got to
With radio, it’s important to be aware that your ability
to talk about the music, how you play, and the ideas that you have are
all aspects of being a musician that musicians aren’t taught. When
you’re at conservatory or wherever you study music, you often think of
it as solely honing your craft and becoming a better instrumentalist.
But in fact, in order to function in the world, you have to be able to
articulate with words why you play a certain way and to reach out to
people. I think that the fact that I’ve been able to do that has really
helped my career a lot, and that would be something that I would
encourage young people to develop.
What was your inspiration for your album Night in collaboration with Tift Merritt? It stretched the boundaries of your classical field.
Tift and I had become friends. We met through an interview for Gramophone
magazine, which had decided to do a feature about me when I came out
with my second album on Telarc. They thought it would be interesting to
have a musician from another genre interview me and they chose Tift. We
had this really interesting conversation. I had listened to her
recordings and she had listened to mine, she’d come to a concert, and we
really hit it off and realized we had a lot in common as musicians and
as people. So, we started going to each other’s concerts and hanging out
socially, and thought it would be really special if we could
collaborate, but we didn’t know what kind of shape that would take. It
took a while for us to work it out, but a lot of it had to do with
choosing the right songs and exploring how we could interpret them in a
way that felt true to ourselves while exploring a different medium.
I understand that you actually opened up the piano and hammered on the strings on this album?
In one or two of the pieces I pluck the strings a la
George Crumb. It created a sound similar to a dulcimer, which is much
more from the tradition that Tift comes from. She’s a singer-songwriter
in the alternative-country genre, and [that sound] comes from the folk
tradition—Appalachian folk music.
What are some newer works from living composers that you’re going to be performing this season?
I just premiered this piano concerto that Philip Lasser
wrote for me, called “The Circle and the Child.” I first performed it in
Atlanta and I’ll be doing it a few more times, as well as recording it.
I’m very excited about this work. It’s a beautifully orchestrated
piece. Philip wrote it for me and it really feels that way—he
understood my sound and my sensibility. I’m also going to be playing a
piece this year that Nico Muhly wrote for me. It was commissioned by the
Terezin Foundation. I premiered it last year in Boston at Symphony
Hall, but I’m taking it on the road with me this season in my recital
program, so I’m excited to be doing that. Looking ahead next season, I’m
going to be premiering a piano quintet written for the Chiara String
Quartet and myself by Jefferson Friedman, which was commissioned by the
Library of Congress, so we’re going to be premiering it down there. I’m
looking forward to that.
You said that instrumental training is as much about
how to listen as how to play. Can you tell us about a time when you
heard something in a piece that you hadn’t heard before, that then
changed the way you played it?
I had a particular experience when I was studying with Maria Curcio, who I studied with in London. I was playing Schumann’s Carnaval
and I had thought about it as being kind of traditionally romantic
piano writing, and I was really focused on the melody and on bringing
that out. I created a sort of hierarchy of lines that was guided by the
melody. Maria played it for me and pointed out that there were quite a
lot of different voices going on at the same time, and that the
articulation was very different between them. I hadn’t looked at it
carefully enough. I hadn’t looked and seen that actually there were four voices playing, not two. Carnaval
is a piece that’s about almost like a festival of many different
characters. Sometimes there are a few in the same piece and they’re all
running around at the same time. I hadn’t heard that until she played it
for me and as she played it, which made me realize that I had to look a
lot more closely at the score to try to hear every sound that was there
on the page. I couldn’t just gloss over some of it. Every note was
important. It was a real turning point for me to hear her play that,
because it made me look at all music differently afterwards.
What do you like to listen to that might surprise your fans?
One of the people I love very much is the songwriter Leonard Cohen. Not everyone knows who he is—maybe that’s surprising.
If there’s one thing you hope your listeners walk away with, what would it be?
When I think about children studying the Inventions,
oftentimes children that I’ve spoken to—not the ones that I’ve
taught—have thought that Bach was boring or mathematical or dry and were
not at all inspired by his music. I think that these pieces are so
beautiful and imaginative and personal and inspired. So first of all, I
hope that children will listen and be excited by the music, and that
that will make them want to play it. I think that’s the best result of a
recording: if somebody wants to then play the piece. Plus, these are
pieces that people do play and can play, as opposed to recording a piece
of music that’s extremely complicated—like when I recorded Beethoven’s
Opus 111—not every single amateur pianist or student can sit down and
play that. I think that the Inventions, on the other hand, successfully
reach a much larger group of people because of their playability. I hope
people will experience for themselves what incredible music Bach is.