Mackie MR8 Mk. 2
By FRANCIS PRÈVE
Thu, 26 Apr 2012
rss

By Francis Preve

IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS, I’VE SWITCHED MONITORS THREE TIMES.
This is partly because I’m trying to find something that compliments my studio acoustics, but more importantly, my ears. A lot of producers get stuck in the “expensive equals better” trap. If that were true, Yamaha’s legendary NS-10 (which gained mythical status for its everyman qualities, not any audiophile specs) would never have become the gold standard for close to two decades. So when Mackie’s MR8 Mk. 2 monitors arrived, I was curious as to how I’d react to them, especially given their low price.

The MR8 Mk. 2s are two-way, bi-amped, active monitors with 8" woofers and a ported design that makes the most of their bass response. The 1" tweeter relies on an internal waveguide that helps widen the sweet spot and in practice, that’s on point. These monitors have a decent width in my very near-field studio.

Inputs are balanced XLR and 1/4" TRS plus unbalanced RCA. Two switches on the back modify high and low frequencies to compensate for room location (e.g., reducing the bass boost if you put the speakers in a bass-enhancing corner). The recessed trim pot has a center detent, useful for making sure gain is identical on the pair.

I make dance music but I listen to everything, so I ran lots of different material through the MR8s: Foo Fighters, Brian Eno, some ’80s new wave, and several mixes I’m working on. The first thing I noticed was that the highs are a little crisp. Not shrill, but crisp, and very different from the shimmery highs of my usual monitors, which are three times as expensive. The upper mids are also pronounced, but again, not unpleasantly so. In fact, this made me a lot more conscientious about the 2–6kHz area of my mixes.

The lows were big and solid and way more present than those on my usual pair, which bothered me. Not because there was something wrong with the MR8s—far from it. I was annoyed because I could finally hear and fix some problems in the low end of a remix I’m currently doing. When it comes to low end, these babies have oomph.

I was really surprised at how much I enjoyed these monitors. They wouldn’t be my first choice for delicate, detailed recordings of jazz or acoustic music. But for pop, rock, hip-hop, or dance music with lots of bass, they’re now among my top recommendations for producers looking for solid quality and Key Buy-winning value.

Snap Judgment

PROS Killer low end. Great entry-level monitors for pop, rock and dance. Highand low-frequency trim switches. Flexible analog connections.

CONS Upper mids and highs may be a trifle crisp for some ears.

$339 list each | $250 street each mackie.com

Register / login to rate articles and leave comments.

Do you employ soft synths as part of a live performance rig?
 Yes, soft synths are what I mainly use.
 Yes, as an adjunct to a mainly hardware keyboard rig.
 No, I gig strictly with hardware synths, digital piano, etc.
 No, because I don't perform live.
 
 
 
 

Keyboard Magazine is a trademark of New Bay Media, LLC. All material published on www.keyboardmag.com is copyrighted @2012 by New Bay Media, LLC. All rights reserved